<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Realism, readiness and rhetoric</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicalclimate.net/2010/07/07/realism-readiness-and-rhetoric/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicalclimate.net/2010/07/07/realism-readiness-and-rhetoric/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 18:30:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aubrey Meyer</title>
		<link>http://politicalclimate.net/2010/07/07/realism-readiness-and-rhetoric/#comment-662</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aubrey Meyer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 09:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalclimate.net/?p=489#comment-662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When this writer says, &quot;But I am not convinced, [about Alex Evan&#039;s argument for C&amp;C - see above] for reasons arising from the fact that both the future – whether political or climate – is fundamentally unknowable.&quot;
. . . this is exactly the &#039;teleological&#039; point: we *need to know&quot; where we are going with climate change policy and crucially whether what are doing collectively adds up to doing enough soon enough to avoid dangerous rates of climate or not.
That is what the C&amp;C method embraces - so it knows where its going because we tell it where to go. As we continue to cause the problem faster than we respond to avoid it, the great danger now is that though we know that we still fail to organize and to operate to deal with that. As I believe Jonathon Porritt recently declared, making us all increasingly &quot;marginal and irrelevant.&quot; What an epitaph for humanity.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When this writer says, &#8220;But I am not convinced, [about Alex Evan's argument for C&amp;C - see above] for reasons arising from the fact that both the future – whether political or climate – is fundamentally unknowable.&#8221;<br />
. . . this is exactly the &#8216;teleological&#8217; point: we *need to know&#8221; where we are going with climate change policy and crucially whether what are doing collectively adds up to doing enough soon enough to avoid dangerous rates of climate or not.<br />
That is what the C&amp;C method embraces &#8211; so it knows where its going because we tell it where to go. As we continue to cause the problem faster than we respond to avoid it, the great danger now is that though we know that we still fail to organize and to operate to deal with that. As I believe Jonathon Porritt recently declared, making us all increasingly &#8220;marginal and irrelevant.&#8221; What an epitaph for humanity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Is A US Climate Bill So Elusive? &#171; Political Climate</title>
		<link>http://politicalclimate.net/2010/07/07/realism-readiness-and-rhetoric/#comment-409</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Why Is A US Climate Bill So Elusive? &#171; Political Climate]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalclimate.net/?p=489#comment-409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] with a quasi-religious pitch that suggests we will all face a climate judgement day. Alex Evans in a recent ippr debate pursues a similar line of argument, urging Noah-like [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with a quasi-religious pitch that suggests we will all face a climate judgement day. Alex Evans in a recent ippr debate pursues a similar line of argument, urging Noah-like [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: From Poverty to Power by Duncan Green &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why Google Reader saves you time and expands your mind, with some links I liked on Africa, Climate Change and Aid</title>
		<link>http://politicalclimate.net/2010/07/07/realism-readiness-and-rhetoric/#comment-396</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[From Poverty to Power by Duncan Green &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why Google Reader saves you time and expands your mind, with some links I liked on Africa, Climate Change and Aid]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 08:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalclimate.net/?p=489#comment-396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Is the best way to tackle climate change bottom up (technological innovation) or top down (global ag...? Matthew Lockwood reviews the arguments  and mines some data to ask ‘Do equality and security help the politics of climate?’  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is the best way to tackle climate change bottom up (technological innovation) or top down (global ag&#8230;? Matthew Lockwood reviews the arguments  and mines some data to ask ‘Do equality and security help the politics of climate?’  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Breakthrough Institute: The Emerging Climate Technology Consensus &#124; TrendsCovered.com</title>
		<link>http://politicalclimate.net/2010/07/07/realism-readiness-and-rhetoric/#comment-382</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Breakthrough Institute: The Emerging Climate Technology Consensus &#124; TrendsCovered.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 05:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalclimate.net/?p=489#comment-382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] See Andrew Pendleton &#097;&#110;&#100; Matthew Lockwood &#111;&#102; the UK-based IPPR think tank response to Alex Evans&#8217; contention &#116;&#104;&#097;&#116; real action &#111;&#110; climate will [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See Andrew Pendleton &#097;&#110;&#100; Matthew Lockwood &#111;&#102; the UK-based IPPR think tank response to Alex Evans&#8217; contention &#116;&#104;&#097;&#116; real action &#111;&#110; climate will [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

